Home   News   Article

New affordable housing gets the green light in Peterhead


By Kirstie Topp - Local Democracy Reporter

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
The new flats and homes will be built on a site in Peterhead.
The new flats and homes will be built on a site in Peterhead.

Plans for new affordable housing in Peterhead have been given the go-ahead.

Grampian Housing Association had sought permission to build 12 flats and seven homes on North Street.

The site, located on the corner of Brook Lane, was formerly used as a storage yard but has lain empty for a number of years.

All of the flats will have one-bedroom, while the homes will each have three-bedrooms.

The site will also have 19 car parking spaces, including one disabled bay.

The townhouses will all have their own gardens, while an open green space will be created behind the flats.

Future residents of the flats will also benefit from a communal drying area as well as bin storage and cycle store for 11 bikes.

One resident who lives near the site objected to the proposal over fears the new homes would lead to an increase in traffic noise.

He also believed the development would cause overlooking and block light to his property.

The new flats and homes will be built on a site in Peterhead.
The new flats and homes will be built on a site in Peterhead.

The council’s own roads development team also opposed to the plan.

They said the proposed parking provision fell “well below” the local authority’s standard and was “not acceptable”.

But despite this opposition, council planners recommended the application be approved.

They argued the development would add to the current affordable housing stock in Peterhead and said the site was “appropriate”.

The application recently went before the Buchan area committee but was unanimously backed by councillors.

Grampian Housing Association previously submitted plans to construct 24 flats on the same site back in 2018.

That proposal was later approved however the project never came to fruition.


Do you want to respond to this article? If so, click here to submit your thoughts and they may be published in print.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More