Comment: Call for improved consultation from SSEN over electricity pylon line in key farming area
Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.
Consultations by electricity grid chiefs with local communities over planned major transmission infrastructure fall short of required standards, according to a leading property expert.
Landowners are being advised act to secure a fair hearing, and if eligible, compensation over a proposed multi-million-pound network upgrade affecting the Mearns district between Aberdeen and Dundee.
SSEN Transmission, Scottish & Southern Electricity Networks’ grid arm, is planning a 400kilovolt scheme to supply customers with renewable energy from onshore and large-scale offshore wind farms.
The East Coast 400kV Phase 2 project includes 65 miles of new overhead line between Kintore and Tealing via Fiddes, a 400kV substation at Tealing and overhead line ‘re-conductors’ between Alyth, Tealing and Westfield.
Affected residents gathered on Saturday night in Pitarrow, between Stonehaven and Forfar, to discuss their response to the proposals with Andrew Bowie, Minister for Nuclear and Networks and Conservative MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, Mairi Gougeon, Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands and MSP for Angus North and Mearns, and George Carr, an Aberdeenshire local councillor.
Also present at the meeting, organised by the Save our Mearns pressure group, was Ian Thornton-Kemsley of the property consultancy Galbraith.
The Mearns route reflects a major policy change from SSEN’s position in May 2020, when the energy network company said such a new line would have more environmental effects, be more costly to consumers and take longer than upgrading existing lines.
According to Mr Thornton-Kemsley, an expert on the property aspects of energy and utility projects. “There are unanswered questions about why SSEN has discarded other options and appears to be going for an entirely new line through unspoilt countryside.”
Major nationwide works are required to serve growing demand for electricity and enable the UK’s switch to renewable energy.
That involves shifting from networks designed to carry electricity from coal, gas and nuclear generators to systems that serve the growing number of wind and solar farms around the country.
It also means between 150,000 and 450,000 miles of additional transmission and distribution network across Britain, according to some sources.
National Grid said in March: “To meet the Government’s target of 50GW of offshore wind by 2030, our industry must deliver more than five times the amount of transmission infrastructure in the next seven years, than has been built in the past 30 years.”
"Each of the tree alternatives route proposed by SSEN from Fiddes to Forfar runs through predominantly prime agricultural land – a category occupying only 8 per cent of Scotland," said Mr Thornton-Kemsley.
The plans involve vehicles travelling a 39-mile stretch, potentially risking the spread of pathogens such as Potato Cyst Nematode (PCN) and Clubroot in a key area for seed potatoes as well as daffodils and oilseed rape.
In the past 10 years PCN-infected land has risen by 30 per cent and unchecked, any continuation could fatally damage the Scottish seed potato industry.
“SSEN’s contractors have demonstrated during surveys for this project they cannot follow their own biosecurity protocols – have we any faith they will follow the sort of biosecurity essential to protect agriculture in a project such as this? I think not,” said Mr Thornton-Kemsley of Galbraith, who is instructed to represent a number of affected parties along the route.
Further, though the risk of exposure to magnetic fields and ill health is considered low, public perceptions may affect the marketability and future value of the property, so that houses close to pylon lines may be significantly devalued.
“SSEN has yet to explain how it will fulfil its duty to mitigate any adverse effects its proposals may have on properties and natural beauty, and it is difficult to see how this is possible without the loss of further prime agricultural land,” said Mr Thornton-Kemsley.
“In my opinion the company’s consultation to date, and the way it has gone about it, fall far short.
"Anyone affected by these changes should talk to us.”
